Collaborative and open science writing

As we collectively move to platforms that support better reproducibility and open science, a few tiny challenges persist. Reference management. LaTex with BibTex is great, but at times, team members are interested less in reproducibility and more in just sharing the libraries. We recently faced this challenge because we were collaboratively writing a very long white paper and each of us worked in a different management ecosystem in spite of using GitHub to control the versioning and collaboration in the writing.

Here are some resources to support a decision. Anecdotal research similar.

List with satisfaction scores

Refworks, Easbib, Endnote, and Mendeley look promising.

Good contrast here including discussion of Zotero.

Gradhacker review here of offerings.

Writing in google docs collaboratively use paperpile.

Writing in RStudio use Zotero.

Summary

Great lists of pros and cons out there. Based on the various lists, I vote for key criteria as a. cloud storage, b. can use in RStudio easily, c. allows me to share library with collaborators for a given paper.

The three competitors seem to be Refworks, Mendeley, and Zotero.
Now, need to give them a head-to-head test shortly.